Jobber — AI visibility

Jobber holds 20% of the conversation. Jobber holds 20%.

July 2026 edition · field service management software

Jobber20%
Housecall Pro16%

Share of the source corpus AI assistants read for the 43 buying questions in this segment.

20%share of AI sources
#1of 33 vendors
42/43buying questions covered
2.5average position in lists

What this costs Jobber

1 of 43 buying questions have no independent source naming this vendor. When a buyer asks an assistant one of these, the answer is a list of competitors.

Sources that name competitors and not this vendor

11 domains in the corpus cite at least one competitor and never this vendor. Highest-weight first — these are the pages that move the number.

SourceTypeWeightCompetitors named
makula.ioeditorial1.40FieldPulse, Praxedo, ServiceMax, Zuper
provalet.ioeditorial1.25BuildOps, ServiceTrade
getexterio.comeditorial1.00JobNimbus, ServiceTitan
getply.comeditorial1.00JobNimbus, ServiceTitan
formester.comeditorial1.00ServiceMax
leadlake.comeditorial1.00JobNimbus
granum.comlow_signal0.40LMN, SingleOps
insights.velocityaipartners.colow_signal0.40FieldEdge, ServiceTitan
karyaflow.inlow_signal0.40ServiceTitan
vocal.medialow_signal0.40Housecall Pro
lawnlove.comlow_signal0.40Arborgold, Service Autopilot, Yardbook

Get the full audit

This page is the public summary. The full audit adds what it leaves out: every page behind these numbers, the buying questions ranked by revenue intent, and an ordered plan — which source to enter first, with what, and what it moves.

Email hello@thecorpusindex.com with your vendor name. Corrections to this page are welcome and free.

How this is measured · Back to the index